Standardization of Pediatric Noncardiac Operating Room to Intensive Care Unit Handoffs Improves Communication and Patient Care.

OBJECTIVES: Handoffs are critical points in transitioning care between multidisciplinary teams, yet data regarding intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs in pediatric noncardiac surgical patients are lacking. We hypothesized that standardized handoffs from the pediatric operating room (OR) to the ICU would improve physician presence, communication, and patient care parameters. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative was performed at a tertiary children's hospital. Stakeholders (anesthesiologists, nurses, intensivists, and surgeons) developed a standardized OR to pediatric and neonatal ICU handoff process based on common goals and outcomes of interest. Baseline data were collected before intervention. Implementation was carried out in 2 phases, phase 1 with a written handoff and Phase 2 with a scripted handoff process. Data collected by trained observers included handoff attendance, distractions, and transfer of essential patient information. As a surrogate for outcomes, patient care parameter data were collected for 6 hours after transfer. RESULTS: After phase 1, surgery and ICU physician attendance increased significantly, distractions decreased, and communication of essential patient data improved. In phase 2 (scripted handoff), attendance continued to rise, distractions remained decreased, and transfer of essential information was still improved compared with baseline. Mean handoff duration did not significantly change throughout the study. Certain patient care parameters (escalation of respiratory support, additional laboratory studies, vasopressor administration, antibiotic administration and timing) remained unchanged compared with baseline. However, the need for resuscitative fluid bolus or blood products significantly decreased after implementation phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized handoffs for pediatric noncardiac surgical patients from the OR to the ICU can improve provider attendance and communication.

Costs associated with postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric perforated appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscess, the most common complication after perforated appendicitis, is associated with considerable economic burden. However, costs of intra-abdominal abscesses in children are unknown. We aimed to evaluate resource utilization and costs attributable to intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed of children (<18 years) who underwent appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (2013-2019). Hospital costs incurred during the index admission and within 30 postoperative days were obtained from the hospital accounting system and inflated to 2019 USD. Generalized linear models were used to determine excess resource utilization and costs attributable to intra-abdominal abscess after adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Of 763 patients, 153 (20%) developed intra-abdominal abscesses. Eighty-one patients with intra-abdominal abscesses (53%) underwent percutaneous abscess drainage. Intra-abdominal abscess was independently associated with a nearly 8-fold increased risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted risk ratio, 7.8 [95% confidence interval, 4.7-13.0]). Patients who developed an intra-abdominal abscess required 6.1 excess hospital bed days compared to patients without intra-abdominal abscess (95% confidence interval, 5.3-7.0). Adjusted mean hospital costs for patients with intra-abdominal abscess totaled $27,394 (95% confidence interval, $25,688-$29,101) versus $15,586 (95% confidence interval, $15,102-$16,069) for patients without intra-abdominal abscess. Intra-abdominal abscess was associated with an incremental cost of $11,809 (95% confidence interval, $10,029-$13,588). Hospital room costs accounted for 66% of excess costs. CONCLUSION: Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess nearly doubled pediatric perforated appendicitis costs, primarily due to more hospital bed days and associated room costs. Intra-abdominal abscesses resulted in estimated excess costs of $1.8 million during the study period. Even small reductions in intra-abdominal abscess rates or hospital bed days could yield substantial health care savings.

Management of the undescended testis in children: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Management of undescended testes (UDT) has evolved over the last decade. While urologic societies in the United States and Europe have established some guidelines for care, management by North American pediatric surgeons remains variable. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the published evidence regarding the treatment of (UDT) in children. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review, and report salient articles. Five principal questions were asked regarding imaging standards, medical treatment, surgical technique, timing of operation, and outcomes. A literature search was performed from 2005 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 825 articles were identified in the initial search, and 260 were included in the final review. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative imaging and hormonal therapy are generally not recommended except in specific circumstances. Testicular growth and potential for fertility improves when orchiopexy is performed before one year of age. For a palpable testis, a single incision approach is preferred over a two-incision orchiopexy. Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with a slightly lower testicular atrophy rate but a higher rate of long-term testicular retraction. One and two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy have similar rates of testicular atrophy and retraction. There is a higher relative risk of testicular cancer in UDT which may be lessened by pre-pubertal orchiopexy.

Variability in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs: A survey of providers caring for pediatric surgical patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Comprehensive opioid stewardship programs require collective stakeholder alignment and proficiency. We aimed to determine opioid-related prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional survey was conducted of attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers (APPs), who managed pediatric surgical patients. RESULTS: Of 110 providers surveyed, 75% completed the survey. Over half of respondents (n = 43, 52%) reported always/very often prescribing opioids at discharge, with residents reporting the highest rate (66%). Provider types had varying prescribing patterns, including what types of opioids and non-opioids they prescribed. There was a lack of formal training, particularly among residents, of which only 42% reported receiving formal opioid prescribing education. Finally, although only 28% of providers felt that the opioid epidemic affects children, 48% believed pediatric providers' prescribing patterns contributed to the opioid epidemic as a whole, and 80% reported changing their prescribing practices in response. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability exists in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. Effective opioid stewardship requires comprehensive policies, pediatric specific guidelines, and education for all providers caring for children to align provider proficiency and optimize prescribing patterns.

Early discharge after nonoperative management of intussusception is both safe and cost-effective.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative to safely reduce post-reduction monitoring for pediatric patients with ileocolic intussusception. We hypothesized that there would be decreased length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs, with no change in intussusception recurrence rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric ileocolic intussusception patients who underwent successful enema reduction at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital from January 2015 through June 2020. In September 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented, which allowed discharge within four hours of reduction. Pre- and post-QI outcomes were compared for index encounters and any additional encounter beginning within 24 h of discharge. An economic evaluation was performed with hospital costs inflation-adjusted to 2020 United States Dollars ($). Cost differences between groups were assessed using multivariable regression, adjusting for Medicaid and transfer status, P < 0.05 significant. RESULTS: Of 90 patients, 37(41%) were pre-QI and 53(59%) were post-QI. Patients were similar by age, sex, race, insurance status, and transfer status. Pre-QI patients had a median LOS of 23.4 h (IQR: 16.1-34.6) versus 9.3 h (IQR 7.4-14.2) for post-QI patients, P < 0.001. Mean total costs per patient in the pre-QI group were $3,231 (95% CI, $2,442-$4,020) versus $1,861 (95% CI, $1,481-$2,240) in the post-QI group. The mean absolute cost difference was $1,370 less per patient in the post-QI group (95% CI, [-$2,251]-[-$490]). Five patients had an additional encounter within 24 h of discharge [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 4 (8%), p = 0.7] with four having intussusception recurrence [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 3 (6%), p = 0.6]. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement initiative for the treatment of pediatric intussusception reduced hospital length of stay and costs without negatively affecting post-discharge encounters or recurrence rates. Similar protocols can easily be adopted at other institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative treatment study.

Management and outcomes for long-segment Hirschsprung disease: A systematic review from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee.

OBJECTIVE: Long-Segment Hirschsprung Disease (LSHD) differs clinically from short-segment disease. This review article critically appraises current literature on the definition, management, outcomes, and novel therapies for patients with LSHD. METHODS: Four questions regarding the definition, management, and outcomes of patients with LSHD were generated. English-language articles published between 1990 and 2018 were compiled by searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A qualitative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: 66 manuscripts were included in this systematic review. Standardized nomenclature and preoperative evaluation for LSHD are recommended. Insufficient evidence exists to recommend a single method for the surgical repair of LSHD. Patients with LSHD may have increased long-term gastrointestinal symptoms, including Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), but have a quality of life similar to matched controls. There are few surgical technical innovations focused on this disorder. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized definition of LSHD is recommended that emphasizes the precise anatomic location of aganglionosis. Prospective studies comparing operative options and long-term outcomes are needed. Translational approaches, such as stem cell therapy, may be promising in the future for the treatment of long-segment Hirschsprung disease.

The effects of early anesthesia on neurodevelopment: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There is growing concern regarding the impact of general anesthesia on neurodevelopment in children. Pre-clinical animal studies have linked anesthetic exposure to abnormal central nervous system development, but it is unclear whether these results translate into humans. The purpose of this systematic review from the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice (OEBP) Committee was to review, summarize, and evaluate the evidence regarding the neurodevelopmental impact of general anesthesia on children and identify factors that may affect the risk of neurotoxicity. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried for articles published up to and including December 2017 using the search terms "general anesthesia and neurodevelopment" as well as specific anesthetic agents. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to screen manuscripts for inclusion in the review. A consensus statement of recommendations in response to each study question was synthesized based upon the best available evidence. RESULTS: In total, 493 titles were initially identified, with 56 articles selected for full analysis and 44 included for review. Based on currently available developmental assessment tools, a single exposure to general anesthesia does not appear to have a significant effect on general neurodevelopment, although prolonged or multiple anesthetic exposures may have some adverse effects. Exposure to general anesthesia may affect different domains of development at different ages. Regional anesthetic techniques with the addition of dexmedetomidine and/or some intravenous agents may mitigate the risks of neurotoxicity. This approach may be performed safely in some patients and can be considered as an option in selected short procedures. CONCLUSION: There is no conclusive evidence that a single short anesthetic in infancy has a detectable neurodevelopmental effect. Data do not support waiting until later in childhood to perform general anesthesia for single short procedures. With the complexities and nuances of different anesthetic methods, patients and procedures, the planning and execution of anesthesia for the pediatric patient is generally best accomplished by an anesthesiologist, ideally a pediatric anesthesiologist. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-4 (mainly level 3-4).

Prophylactic intraabdominal drains do not confer benefit in pediatric perforated appendicitis: Results from a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prophylactic, intraabdominal drains have been used to prevent intraabdominal abscess (IAA) after perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that routine drain placement would reduce the IAA rate in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A 27-month quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted: closed-suction, intraabdominal drains were placed intraoperatively in pediatric (age < 18) perforated appendicitis patients. QI patients were compared to controls admitted during the preceding 8 months and following 4 months. The primary outcome was 30-day IAA rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy QI patients were compared to 109 controls. There was 100% compliance during 21 of 27 months of the QI initiative; only 7 QI patients did not receive drains. IAA occurred in 20.0% of QI patients and 22.9% of control (p = 0.52). After adjustment, the QI initiative was not associated with reduced odds of IAA (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.44). Median length of stay was longer in QI patients during the index admission (p = 0.03) and over 30 postoperative days (p = 0.03), but these relationships did not persist after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A QI initiative investigating prophylactic, intraabdominal drain placement in perforated appendicitis did not reduce the IAA rate. We recommend against routine drain placement in pediatric perforated appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Teamwork and Surgical Team-Based Training.

Effective teamwork, both in and out of the operating room, is an essential component of safe and efficient surgical performance. There are multiple available assessment tools for evaluating teamwork and important contributors to teamwork such as safety culture and nontechnical skills. Multiple types of interventions exist to improve and train providers on teamwork, and many have been demonstrated to improve not only teamwork but also patient outcomes. Teamwork strategies can be adapted to different contexts, based on provider needs and resources.

Using a Second Stakeholder-Driven Variance Reporting System Improves Pediatric Perioperative Safety.

Despite recognizing the occurrence of variances, we noted a low rate of reporting with the established computer variance program. Therefore, we developed and introduced a simple, handwritten variance reporting system. The goal of this study was to compare our pediatric perioperative handwritten variance cards to our established computerized variance reporting system. METHODS: We developed a handwritten variance card program through a stakeholder-driven quality-improvement initiative. We collected variances from handwritten cards in 4 perioperative locations and also from the established computerized variance system. We analyzed the variances and categorized them into 6 safety domains and 5 variance categories. RESULTS: Over 6 consecutive years, 3,434 variances were reported (687 computerized and 2,747 handwritten). For safety domains, the computerized system was more likely to capture adverse events and near-misses (8.7% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001; 23.5% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001, respectively) while the handwritten system was more likely to identify the safety process and other non-safety issues (20.1% vs. 38.3%, P < 0.001). Both systems addressed policy/process issues most often, with 37.9% of the handwritten cards and 66.6% of the computerized variance reports. Of the handwritten cards with a patient identifier (n = 1,407), only 5.1% (n = 72) also had a computerized variance filed about the same event. Thus, staff reported >1,300 additional variances that were not identified with the computerized variance system alone. CONCLUSION: The handwritten, stakeholder-driven variance reporting system was essential to identify local and system issues that would not have been identified by the computerized variance reporting system alone.

Management of long gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of the neonate with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging scenarios facing pediatric surgeons today. Contributing to this challenge is the variability in case definition, multiple approaches to management, and heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. This necessitates a clear summary of existing evidence and delineation of treatment controversies. METHODS: The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted four consensus-based questions regarding LGEA. These questions concerned the definition and determination of LGEA, the optimal method of surgical management, expected long-term outcomes, and novel therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search strategy was crafted and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review and report salient articles. RESULTS: More than 3000 publications were reviewed, with 178 influencing final recommendations. In total, 18 recommendations are provided, primarily based on level 4-5 evidence. These recommendations provide detailed descriptions of the definition of LGEA, treatment techniques, outcomes and future directions of research. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supporting best practices for LGEA is currently low quality. This review provides best recommendations based on a critical evaluation of the available literature. Based on the lack of strong evidence, prospective and comparative research is clearly needed. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study, prognosis study and study of diagnostic test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-V.

Let the right one in: High admission rate for low-acuity pediatric burns.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize emergency pediatric burn care triage at a tertiary children's hospital to identify targets for quality improvement. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients <18 years with primary burn injuries who presented to a children's emergency department in 2016 was conducted. Demographic and injury characteristics were recorded. Low acuity was defined by size (<5% total body surface area burn), depth (not third degree), and no need for conscious sedation for debridement. Multiple logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 309 pediatric burn patients were triaged in the emergency department. Patients were typically young (median 3.3 years), male (59%), Hispanic (47%), publically insured (77%), and transferred in (65%). Scalding was the most common mechanism (59%). Though most burns were small (median 2% total body surface area), not deep (

Hospital type predicts computed tomography use for pediatric appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines recommend ultrasound (US) over computed tomography (CT) as the primary imaging modality for suspected pediatric appendicitis. Continued high rates of CT use may result in significant unnecessary radiation exposure in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variables associated with preoperative CT use in pediatric appendectomy patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis in 2015-2016 at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for Pediatrics (NSQIP-P) hospitals was conducted. Pediatric (<18 years old) patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis in an NSQIP-P hospital from 2015 to 2016 were included. Patients were excluded if they underwent interval or incidental appendectomy or did not have a final diagnosis of appendicitis. Variables associated with imaging evaluation, including age, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, gender and hospital of presentation (NSQIP-P vs. non-NSQIP-P hospital) were evaluated. The primary outcome was receipt of preoperative CT. Secondary outcomes include reimaging practices and trends over time. RESULTS: 22,333 children underwent appendectomies, of which almost all were imaged preoperatively (96.5%) and 36% of whom presented initially to a non-NSQIP-P hospital. Overall, US only was the most common imaging modality (52%), followed by CT only (27%), US+CT (16%), no imaging (3%), MRI +/- CT/US (1%) and MRI only (<1%). On regression, older age (>11 years), obesity (BMI >95th percentile for age), and female gender were associated with increased odds of receiving a CT scan. However, initial presentation to a non-NSQIP-P hospital was the strongest predictor of CT use (OR 9.4, 95% CI 8.1-10.8). Reimaging after transfer was common, especially after US and MRI at a non-NSQIP-P hospital. CT use decreased between 2015 and 2016 in non-NSQIP-P hospitals but remained the same (25%) in NSQIP-P facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Though patient characteristics were associated with different imaging practices, presentation at a referral, nonchildren's hospital is the strongest predictor of CT use in children with appendicitis. NSQIP-P hospitals frequently reimage transferred patients and have not reduced their CT use. Novel strategies are required for all hospital types in order to sustain reduction in CT use and mitigate unnecessary imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

Ovarian masses in the child and adolescent: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of ovarian masses in pediatric patients should balance appropriate surgical management with the preservation of future reproductive capability. Preoperative estimation of malignant potential is essential to planning an optimal surgical strategy. METHODS: The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee drafted three consensus-based questions regarding the evaluation and treatment of ovarian masses in pediatric patients. A search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify articles for review. RESULTS: Preoperative tumor markers, ultrasound malignancy indices, and the presence or absence of the ovarian crescent sign on imaging can help estimate malignant potential prior to surgical resection. Frozen section also plays a role in operative strategy. Surgical staging is useful for directing chemotherapy and for prognostication. Both unilateral oophorectomy and cystectomy have been used successfully for germ cell and borderline ovarian tumors, although cystectomy may be associated with higher rates of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant potential of ovarian masses can be estimated preoperatively, and fertility-sparing techniques may be appropriate depending on the type of tumor. This review provides recommendations based on a critical evaluation of recent literature. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-4 (mainly 3-4).

Room for "quality" improvement? Validating National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) appendectomy data.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate data are essential for the validity of clinical registries. This study aimed to validate NSQIP-P data, assess representativeness, and evaluate risk-adjusted predictive ability at a single institution. METHODS: A prospective appendectomy-specific pediatric surgery research database (RD) maintained by clinical researchers was compared to the NSQIP-P data for appendectomies performed in 2016 at a tertiary children's hospital. NSQIP-P sampled data collected by trained surgical clinical reviewers (SCRs) were compared to matched RD patients. Both datasets used NSQIP-P definitions. Using χ2, datasets were compared by patient demographics, disease severity (simple vs. complicated), and outcomes. RESULTS: 458 appendectomies for acute appendicitis were performed in 2016, of which 250 (55%) were abstracted by SCRs and matched to RD patients. Patient demographics were similar between datasets. Disease severity (NSQIP-P:50% complicated vs RD:31% complicated) and composite morbidity (NSQIP-P:6.0% vs RD:14.4%) were significantly different (both p < 0.01). Demographics and outcomes were similar between matched (n = 250) and unsampled patients in the RD (n = 208). NSQIP-P's risk-adjusted predicted morbidity was significantly lower than morbidity observed in all (n = 458) RD patients (NSQIP-P:9.9% vs RD:14.2%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Though constituting a representative sample, NSQIP-P appendectomy data were inconsistent with department data. Discrepancies appear to be the result of underreporting of outcome variables and disease misclassification. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Too much of a bad thing: Discharge opioid prescriptions in pediatric appendectomy patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse is a public health crisis in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate the discharge opioid prescription practices for pediatric simple appendectomy patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric appendectomy patients at a tertiary children's hospital was conducted from October 2016 to January 2018. Only patients with simple appendicitis were included. Written opioid prescriptions were found in the electronic medical record (EMR) or through a statewide prescription monitoring database. All dosing data were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: During the study, 590 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 371 (62.9%) were diagnosed as having simple acute appendicitis. The majority of patients were prescribed an opioid analgesic (62.5%). Demographics were similar between those who received opioids and those who did not. The OME prescribed per day (range 0.2 to 3.4 mg/kg/day) was highly variable as was duration of prescription (1 to 30 days). Odds of emergency department visit were 3.3 times higher (95% CI 1.3-8.2) in those who received opioids. CONCLUSION: Postdischarge prescription practices for pediatric appendectomy are highly variable. Two-thirds of patients who received narcotics had a higher rate of complications. Greater scrutiny is required to optimize opioid stewardship. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased complications in pediatric surgery are associated with comorbidities and not with Down syndrome itself.

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic condition associated with multiple comorbidities. While physicians may perceive that DS patients have more postoperative complications, the literature remains unclear. This study compared postoperative complications for children with and without DS who underwent abdominal and thoracic procedures. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric was queried for patients aged <18 years, who underwent abdominal and noncardiac thoracic operations (by Current Procedural Terminology codes) from 2012 to 2015. The analysis compared patients based on the presence or absence of DS. The primary outcome was a composite of all postoperative complications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric. The analysis utilized chi-square, Student's t-test, and univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 91,478 patients included, of which 1476 (1.6%) had a diagnosis of DS. Patients with DS had higher rates of preoperative nutritional support (38.8% versus 15.0%), developmental delay (61.9% versus 10.4%), and cardiac risk factors (76.5% versus 13.8%). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 11.1%, with a greater proportion in DS patients (16.2% versus 10.8%, P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, DS was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.6 95% confidence interval 1.4-1.9) compared with the non-DS group; however, DS was not a risk factor after adjusting for other covariates (adjusted odds ratio 0.86 95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of postoperative complications were observed in patients with DS. However, after adjusting for other risk factors, DS was not an independent risk factor. The increased rate of complications is likely related to the presence of multiple comorbidities in DS.

Adherence to the Pediatric Preinduction Checklist Is Improved When Parents Are Engaged in Performing the Checklist.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends including the parents in completion of the pediatric surgical safety checklist. At our hospital, the preinduction surgical safety checklist is conducted in the preoperative holding with anesthesia, nursing, and often with the parents of children undergoing an operative procedure. We hypothesized that adherence to the preinduction checklist is better when parents are engaged in surgical safety checklist performance. METHODS: An observational study of adherence to the preinduction checklist for nonemergent pediatric operations was performed (2016-2017). Adherence was defined as verbalization of checkpoints. Only checkpoints (patient identification, procedure, site marking, weight, allergies, and NPO status) relevant to parental knowledge were evaluated. Parental engagement was based on: positive body language, eye contact, lack of distractions, and understanding of checkpoints. RESULTS: 484 preinduction surgical safety checklists were observed (interrater reliability >0.7). Partial completion occurred in 55% cases; only 41% checklists were fully completed. Parents were present for 81% of checklists, and more checkpoints were performed when parents were present (5, IQR 4-6) versus absent (2, IQR 1-3, P < .001). Increased preinduction adherence was associated with increased parent engagement by linear regression analysis (1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.33). Staff confirmed more checkpoints with engaged parents (28-78%) versus when parents were not engaged (1-9%, P < .001 for all checkpoints). CONCLUSION: Overall preinduction surgical safety checklist performance was poor (less than half of checklists fully completed). In contrast, checklist adherence improved with parental presence and engagement during performance of the checklist.

Home Antibiotics at Discharge for Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis: Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND: The role of home antibiotics (HA) at discharge in children after perforated appendicitis is unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of complicated appendicitis in patients being discharged with or without HA after initial operation and inpatient treatment. STUDY DESIGN: The 2015 and 2016 NSQIP-Pediatric database was queried for patients younger than 18 years of age with complicated appendicitis. Home antibiotics were prescribed or not (no home antibiotics [NHA]). Patients were stratified based on presence or absence of predischarge surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative day of discharge (≤5 days or >5 days). The primary end point was 30-day postdischarge composite morbidity, including emergency department visit, readmission, postdischarge reoperation, and SSI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline covariables. RESULTS: Of 6,412 patients with complicated appendicitis, the majority were discharged with HA (HA 56.4%; NHA 43.6%). Patients receiving HA had higher preoperative leukocytosis, longer procedures, higher incidence of sepsis, more predischarge SSIs, and longer length of stay than the NHA cohort (all p < 0.01), suggesting greater severity of illness. In adjusted multivariable models, HA patients without a predischarge SSI had higher postdischarge morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.44), as did HA patients discharged ≤5 days post operation (aOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.57) compared with NHA patients. Composite morbidity was similar between NHA and HA patients with predischarge SSIs (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.56 to 2.00) or who were discharged >5 days post operation (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis are discharged with HA, NSQIP-Pediatric data suggest there is no evidence of a significant benefit. There might be a cohort of patients with more severe disease who require continued antibiotics.

Are we missing the near misses in the OR?-underreporting of safety incidents in pediatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Electronic hospital variance reporting systems used to report near misses and adverse events are plagued by underreporting. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate directly observed variances that occur in our pediatric operating room and to correlate these with the two established variance reporting systems in our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trained individuals directly observed pediatric perioperative patient care for 6 wk to identify near misses and adverse events. These direct observations were compared to the established handwritten perioperative variance cards and the electronic hospital variance reporting system. All observations were analyzed and categorized into an additional six safety domains and five variance categories. The chi-square test was used, and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of 830 surgical cases, 211 were audited by the safety observers. During this period, 137 (64%) near misses were identified by direct observation, while 57 (7%) handwritten and 8 (1%) electronic variance were reported. Only 1 of 137 observed events was reported in the handwritten variance system. Five directly observed adverse events were not reported in either of the two variance reporting systems. Safety observers were more likely to recognize time-out and equipment variances (P < 0.001). Both variance reporting systems and direct observation identified numerous policy and process issues. CONCLUSIONS: Despite multiple reporting systems, near misses and adverse events remain underreported. Identifying near misses may help address system and process issues before an adverse event occurs. Efforts need to be made to lessen barriers to reporting in order to improve patient safety.